| Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Brett
Posts : 685 Join date : 2009-06-26 Age : 33
| Subject: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:30 pm | |
| http://www.mediafire.com/?mvzgo25cizy
Aztec British Portuguese versus India Ottoman Spain
Yet another win for Magic British Lamer and Magic Brett, with Magic Alex The Economist! Actually a fairly nice game, I fuck up pretty horribly at the start but we manage to pull a win out of horrible death. | |
|
| |
BedingBedang
Posts : 356 Join date : 2009-06-30
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:19 am | |
| - Brett wrote:
- http://www.mediafire.com/?mvzgo25cizy
Aztec British Portuguese versus India Ottoman Spain
Yet another win for Magic British Lamer and Magic Brett, with Magic Alex The Economist! Actually a fairly nice game, I fuck up pretty horribly at the start but we manage to pull a win out of horrible death. Good team play from your team, I must say. It was going pretty well for me until you guys start to mix it up. Maybe Sav coming in cliffs, bringing Brett's azteq to mix with kerk's brit, wasnt a good idea afterall. gg | |
|
| |
Clown
Posts : 127 Join date : 2009-07-03 Age : 37 Location : Washington State
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:35 am | |
| proton did awful they should have lost bc of that | |
|
| |
_spunk_
Posts : 787 Join date : 2009-07-02 Location : Mighty England
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:22 am | |
| - Clown wrote:
- proton did awful they should have lost bc of that
he got pwned but as usual he makes his excuses | |
|
| |
Clown
Posts : 127 Join date : 2009-07-03 Age : 37 Location : Washington State
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:42 am | |
| - _spunk_ wrote:
- Clown wrote:
- proton did awful they should have lost bc of that
he got pwned but as usual he makes his excuses Just the fact that he didnt even send his home city cards and even manage his idles was enough for me he deserved a loss just because of that. 10+ minutes went buy and he got 10+ cards before he even sent dragoon range, dragoon combat, building hp, team walls or even for shits his 30 indian card O_O Shame you guys lost when going against somebody that lazy | |
|
| |
goldengold
Posts : 552 Join date : 2009-07-21 Age : 30 Location : Norway,Stavanger
| |
| |
J4|V|3$
Posts : 495 Join date : 2009-10-24 Age : 30 Location : Seattle
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:43 pm | |
| or youve played 900 games in like 1 year | |
|
| |
_spunk_
Posts : 787 Join date : 2009-07-02 Location : Mighty England
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:11 pm | |
| - Clown wrote:
- _spunk_ wrote:
- Clown wrote:
- proton did awful they should have lost bc of that
he got pwned but as usual he makes his excuses Just the fact that he didnt even send his home city cards and even manage his idles was enough for me he deserved a loss just because of that. 10+ minutes went buy and he got 10+ cards before he even sent dragoon range, dragoon combat, building hp, team walls or even for shits his 30 indian card O_O
Shame you guys lost when going against somebody that lazy true but when u coming up against 1 civ wonder kerky boy and brett both dont like to push much so sit back with range what can u do.? all come down to out ecoing u. and its not like otto can do anything v any of them civs | |
|
| |
goldengold
Posts : 552 Join date : 2009-07-21 Age : 30 Location : Norway,Stavanger
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:19 pm | |
| - J4|V|3$ wrote:
- or youve played 900 games in like 1 year
Yep, it's called using your time wisely But its been a month and a half. So i average like 2 games a day. | |
|
| |
Brett
Posts : 685 Join date : 2009-06-26 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:04 pm | |
| - _spunk_ wrote:
- true but when u coming up against 1 civ wonder kerky boy and brett both dont like to push much so sit back with range what can u do.? all come down to out ecoing u. and its not like otto can do anything v any of them civs
Pushing with Aztec means burning your economy. Plus our position after knocking you boys off our butt wasn't exactly ideal to push in. Also, Ottoman do fine versus Portugal. It's a bit BS depending on map position, but Ottoman can beat a Portugal just fine. You guys also never seized an opportunity to double up and go Abus Howdah versus Proton, forcing me to leave Kerk in a horrible position versus Spain with 4 natives. You guys just didn't fully utilize all your teams assets as the game went on. | |
|
| |
savorybeef
Posts : 373 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Buffalo NY
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:44 pm | |
| abus howdah wouldnt of mattered, if either you or kerk came my units would be useless, lbow and erk rape abus. wouldve ended the same way bb wouldnt of had enough eco to keep up a 4 native spam, especially against a brit at his walls | |
|
| |
Brett
Posts : 685 Join date : 2009-06-26 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:01 pm | |
| You guys still had more options available too you than letting BB drain in the natives :\ | |
|
| |
savorybeef
Posts : 373 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Buffalo NY
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:13 pm | |
| likeee what? falling back and getting out eco'd? | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome | |
| |
|
| |
| Brett Kerk Alex v Alan Nathan Jerome | |
|