gøldengøld PWNING _SPUNK_

portoz V spaniards. . .

http://www.mediafire.com/?yhdmnklgyy2

not gunna lie it was pwned aswell.....

cant win em all bro.

bad game nothing to see there what could be interesting

its a humbling expeience to lose.

it happens ill get over it. if der gartner wants a 1v1 sometime im down lets see what u can do

its a lose. no need to go after him.

i was actually very srurprized this game. you left the spain spearmen guys at the bottom and didnt send over like you usually do. it messed you up imo.

he out played you. spain should beat them. also you built the trade post too late for wood gathering. right? i forget.

Buck the System wrote:

its a lose. no need to go after him.

i was actually very srurprized this game. you left the spain spearmen guys at the bottom and didnt send over like you usually do. it messed you up imo.

he out played you. spain should beat them. also you built the trade post too late for wood gathering. right? i forget.

mmm another good post, something strange is happening, ill read the rest before i decide

Buck the System wrote:

its a lose. no need to go after him.

i was actually very srurprized this game. you left the spain spearmen guys at the bottom and didnt send over like you usually do. it messed you up imo.

he out played you. spain should beat them. also you built the trade post too late for wood gathering. right? i forget.

yer i totally messed up ,best bet is to push hard on onri but like a tit i decided to elave my spearmen at the top which was a terrible idea , after that i was never set-up properly and just basically got owned

goldengold seems to play bipolar-ly lol. some games he can beat alan other games he gets raped by a first lieut

me playing alan 1v1, I could maybe win 1 out of 100, in a 3v3 team game, I might pull 1 out of 10, if lucky 2, so ina hundred games i might get 10 to 15 out of 100, and thats playing my ass off, lol.

jea and why dont do a 1v1 ...should be interesting.

_Der_Gärtner_ wrote:

jea and why dont do a 1v1 ...should be interesting.

I see some reasons. If I may :

1.To get better at winning 1v1's
2. To compare yourself and get familiar with a specific (good) player's style and strategies.
3. 1v1 usually means less running, and therefore a better fight, so a good show?

my question was rhetoric, that more was an offer to a 1v1...guess i was that guy facing you (dutch) on orinoco where u spammed more hellabardiers and hussars in my cannons than u built skirms?? your team almost lost cause of you...at the end i was in front 1200 points....me 3100 u 1900...u tell me something about good player´s style`? i can remember no game losing vs u very sry...and a look in elorating doesnt bring anything im splitted on several accounts.

but a final thing i want to say to you :

in all 1v1 i played i didnt run ONE TIME ..yesterday lyonard lost vs me 1v1...creepyslash before...now they´re quiet about running i guess. BUT if you fear running, i will if i cant win otherwise, its another tactic if you cant go more forward. its easy to say : you are a runner. but thats not really dissing me.

lyonard and creepyslash arent considered GOOD players. play alan or somebody in a 1v1 and youll see how bad you are

1 v 1 is usually more about speed and pressure than micro/macro. I am not bad doing this in general and players like Savory are very good for harrassing early and fast (less than 10 minutes fight). And it's not forbidden running while u attack because u wont go/get doubled in 1v1
never played alan in 1v1 game, we should do this

savorybeef wrote:

lyonard and creepyslash arent considered GOOD players. play alan or somebody in a 1v1 and youll see how bad you are

maybe right, but they can tell you that im not running.

savorybeef wrote:

lyonard and creepyslash arent considered GOOD players. play alan or somebody in a 1v1 and youll see how bad you are

I thought this game showed that alan is NOT a good player

any ones good on andes. sir spam alot.

goldengold wrote:

savorybeef wrote:

lyonard and creepyslash arent considered GOOD players. play alan or somebody in a 1v1 and youll see how bad you are

I thought this game showed that alan is NOT a good player

loool the 1 time u ever beat me and it had to be in a 1v1, u have to many crap games to be considered good . thats why u got the nick name goldennub

hilarion wrote:

1 v 1 is usually more about speed and pressure than micro/macro. I am not bad doing this in general and players like Savory are very good for harrassing early and fast (less than 10 minutes fight). And it's not forbidden running while u attack because u wont go/get doubled in 1v1
never played alan in 1v1 game, we should do this

cant wait

hilarion is a good player and person i must add.

_spunk_ wrote:

goldengold wrote:

savorybeef wrote:

lyonard and creepyslash arent considered GOOD players. play alan or somebody in a 1v1 and youll see how bad you are

I thought this game showed that alan is NOT a good player

loool the 1 time u ever beat me and it had to be in a 1v1, u have to many crap games to be considered good . thats why u got the nick name goldennub

Much more to come old man.

o O lol.

goldengold wrote:

_spunk_ wrote:

goldengold wrote:

savorybeef wrote:

lyonard and creepyslash arent considered GOOD players. play alan or somebody in a 1v1 and youll see how bad you are

I thought this game showed that alan is NOT a good player

loool the 1 time u ever beat me and it had to be in a 1v1, u have to many crap games to be considered good . thats why u got the nick name goldennub

Much more to come old man.

looking forward to it little nipper , just because someones voice has broke dont make them old