72-12-98 2835 NANOMENSCH-Germans

A really nice boom

may check it out. give lil more info about the boom because if its just rehashing what i showed its just a copy cat.

imperial time?

vill out time?

unspeant?

total upgrades?

Buck the System wrote:

may check it out. give lil more info about the boom because if its just rehashing what i showed its just a copy cat.

imperial time?

vill out time?

unspeant?

total upgrades?

Watch? We, most players, don't actually care about some stuff, because that isn't always necessary better.

A faster age 5 time doesn't mean better boom or more score/resources. It just means faster 5.

I suppose he upgraded all he needed, so it's a great boom.

Tom wrote:

Buck the System wrote:

may check it out. give lil more info about the boom because if its just rehashing what i showed its just a copy cat.

imperial time?

vill out time?

unspeant?

total upgrades?

Watch? We, most players, don't actually care about some stuff, because that isn't always necessary better.

A faster age 5 time doesn't mean better boom or more score/resources. It just means faster 5.

I suppose he upgraded all he needed, so it's a great boom.

wow that is just not even acceptable imo. any civ getting to age 5 fastest is a better boom, which results is better resource counts. i dont look at score anymore because all of you guys dont upgrade everything. upgrading everything gives the best veiw of the overal picture. picking and choosing what to upgrade is a scapegoat for most others posting their booms.

like i said, i might watch it but wanted more info. posting a game without info isnt the right way to go. post info about the boom not the screenshots.

wtf this doesnt even have the recording.....what a waste. thx dude.

no, its recorded, ill just try how to post this stuff

theres a ton of file hosting sites. choose one and copy and paste the upload from the file hosting site you have chonsen. i use file den but for the free use the only give you 50mb.

http://www.fileden.com/getfile.php?file_path=http://www.fileden.com/files/2009/11/25/2664306/NANOMENSCH-german2835.zip
here it is

What the hell is this? I never ever saw a boom, which was that:
-realistic
-much Entertainment while watching
-based
- and UNBuzz_D

I think my eco is realistic, but i dont know why my score is so low, ive made the imperial upgrades

Sandersonian factory placement... (MY legacy!!!) luvin' it

yeah, they are very good placed, in a rated game mortars wouldnt say no xDD

Buck the System wrote:

Tom wrote:

Buck the System wrote:

may check it out. give lil more info about the boom because if its just rehashing what i showed its just a copy cat.

imperial time?

vill out time?

unspeant?

total upgrades?

Watch? We, most players, don't actually care about some stuff, because that isn't always necessary better.

A faster age 5 time doesn't mean better boom or more score/resources. It just means faster 5.

I suppose he upgraded all he needed, so it's a great boom.

wow that is just not even acceptable imo. any civ getting to age 5 fastest is a better boom, which results is better resource counts. i dont look at score anymore because all of you guys dont upgrade everything. upgrading everything gives the best veiw of the overal picture. picking and choosing what to upgrade is a scapegoat for most others posting their booms.

like i said, i might watch it but wanted more info. posting a game without info isnt the right way to go. post info about the boom not the screenshots.

No, going to age 5 faster isn't always better. I've seen booms where people age later, but have a better score/resources. Fastest age 5 isn't necessary.

+1 i remember a game on andes ages ago, alan aged pretty late for germany, like 21 and still had a 2400+ score which is pretttty good for a 3v3

Buck the System wrote:

Tom wrote:

Buck the System wrote:

may check it out. give lil more info about the boom because if its just rehashing what i showed its just a copy cat.

imperial time?

vill out time?

unspeant?

total upgrades?

Watch? We, most players, don't actually care about some stuff, because that isn't always necessary better.

A faster age 5 time doesn't mean better boom or more score/resources. It just means faster 5.

I suppose he upgraded all he needed, so it's a great boom.

wow that is just not even acceptable imo. any civ getting to age 5 fastest is a better boom, which results is better resource counts. i dont look at score anymore because all of you guys dont upgrade everything. upgrading everything gives the best veiw of the overal picture. picking and choosing what to upgrade is a scapegoat for most others posting their booms.

like i said, i might watch it but wanted more info. posting a game without info isnt the right way to go. post info about the boom not the screenshots.

I though you said that my boom wasn't ok because even though I aged to 5 3 minutes earlier, it was too fast?

Age 5 isn't always a better boom imo, but it helps many times.

Firom wrote:

Buck the System wrote:

Tom wrote:

Buck the System wrote:

may check it out. give lil more info about the boom because if its just rehashing what i showed its just a copy cat.

imperial time?

vill out time?

unspeant?

total upgrades?

Watch? We, most players, don't actually care about some stuff, because that isn't always necessary better.

A faster age 5 time doesn't mean better boom or more score/resources. It just means faster 5.

I suppose he upgraded all he needed, so it's a great boom.

wow that is just not even acceptable imo. any civ getting to age 5 fastest is a better boom, which results is better resource counts. i dont look at score anymore because all of you guys dont upgrade everything. upgrading everything gives the best veiw of the overal picture. picking and choosing what to upgrade is a scapegoat for most others posting their booms.

like i said, i might watch it but wanted more info. posting a game without info isnt the right way to go. post info about the boom not the screenshots.

I though you said that my boom wasn't ok because even though I aged to 5 3 minutes earlier, it was too fast?

Age 5 isn't always a better boom imo, but it helps many times.

Can't remember.

theres 2 civs where aging late is ok.....its china and iro. any other civ that ages late will not see the max eco that getting to age 5 faster gives.

firom you dont know jack! if thats what you think is better for india your wrong. you didnt even have the resources to do the imperial ups when you got there. lol

you want to be speedy and get to age 5 fast? then make it worth it and have the resources for imperial food/gold/wood upgrades when you get there. getting to age 5 and not having the resources to do those upgrades is why theres no difference in resource counts even though you aged faster. lol

Buck the System wrote:

getting to age 5 and not having the resources to do those upgrades is why theres no difference in resource counts even though you aged faster. lol

Which is why a faster age 5 isn't always better.

Looking at the constellation of the moon and sun a good age time is never bad , but i think only the ressources and the upgrades counts

just watched, decent vill micro and timing of some upgrades were off while you had the resurces for them but didnt do them at the proper time. overall nice job.

btw, no trade posts.....that gave you at least 1 maybe 2 cards you shouldnt get normally.

the total resources for your boom were 277,000 or so

mine were 284000 or so. this is evident in my build order making the eco better even without a trade route. just saying......

Buck the System wrote:

theres 2 civs where aging late is ok.....its china and iro. any other civ that ages late will not see the max eco that getting to age 5 faster gives.

firom you dont know jack! if thats what you think is better for india your wrong. you didnt even have the resources to do the imperial ups when you got there. lol

you want to be speedy and get to age 5 fast? then make it worth it and have the resources for imperial food/gold/wood upgrades when you get there. getting to age 5 and not having the resources to do those upgrades is why theres no difference in resource counts even though you aged faster. lol

can someone ban this troll?

+1

lol, typical comments from problem people.

Am I a "problem" person?

Micro for Villagers? No such thing.

Haody wrote:

Am I a "problem" person?

Micro for Villagers? No such thing.

omg.

Villager micro does exist.