| FIN vs RX7 part deux | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Sanderson_FIN
Posts : 382 Join date : 2009-06-13 Age : 33 Location : Helsinki
| Subject: FIN vs RX7 part deux Fri Aug 14, 2009 6:45 pm | |
| http://www.fileden.com/getfile.php?file_path=http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/2/4/1740216/uofairoparttwo.age3Yrec
rematch Port vs Iro | |
|
| |
E_Drenaline
Posts : 56 Join date : 2009-07-13 Age : 47
| Subject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:20 pm | |
| Watched it.....Damn, you're mean. That was a better game but it seems like Iros just don't have anything for the Ports. UofA took the fight to you, no shame in his game. Much respect from me for both of you guys skillz. (For what little that is worth.) | |
|
| |
MTSP_fuher
Posts : 19 Join date : 2009-06-23 Location : Rio de Janeiro / Brasil
| Subject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:35 am | |
| why did sanderson take a deck with 2 explorer card?? | |
|
| |
Sanderson_FIN
Posts : 382 Join date : 2009-06-13 Age : 33 Location : Helsinki
| Subject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:33 am | |
| when things get tight you need some more explorers... helps me with forward building, trying to keep trade posts mine and the 100 gold it costs to buy them back when they die is a small price for crackshot or sharpshooter or whatever that is... I mainly use it against India's mahouts, not sure why I took that deck now, maybe I don't like using wood chopping cards with Portugal anymore | |
|
| |
Brett
Posts : 685 Join date : 2009-06-26 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:57 am | |
| I don't use wood cards anymore either, I find Portugal's boom is acceptable without. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:42 am | |
| - MTSP_fuher wrote:
- why did sanderson take a deck with 2 explorer card??
thats his trademark. 1 aweful card in every deck to demoralize the opponent. |
|
| |
Brett
Posts : 685 Join date : 2009-06-26 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux Sat Aug 15, 2009 12:03 pm | |
| 2 Explorer isn't really an awful card, crackshot is really useful and they can tank alot of damage with their 3K of HP. | |
|
| |
Sanderson_FIN
Posts : 382 Join date : 2009-06-13 Age : 33 Location : Helsinki
| Subject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:53 am | |
| yea the HP is pretty big, even recovering explorer all the time and sending him straight towards enemy units is worth a card, enemy units shoot at the explorer units instead of your other units... and you have three of them! they look awfully cool (musketeers!) | |
|
| |
cmontuptim
Posts : 91 Join date : 2009-07-04 Age : 36 Location : Adelaide, Australia
| Subject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:47 pm | |
| Hmmm Ive been thinking of a card to replace wood cutting also for ports since I never send it before 40 (prefer advanced arsenal faster art etc etc)..Maybe extra explorers would be worth a shot...Like the pun? | |
|
| |
E_Drenaline
Posts : 56 Join date : 2009-07-13 Age : 47
| Subject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:10 am | |
| Maybe extra explorers would be worth a shot...Like the pun? [/quote] *Rimshot* | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux | |
| |
|
| |
| FIN vs RX7 part deux | |
|